The trade war between the United States and
China is not limited to two nations, with global markets continuing to feel the
pressure. As a chief political ally of the US and major exporter to China,
Australia is somewhat caught in the middle. The trade war recently intensified
with the addition of new tariffs, with the escalation sending shock waves
across the world. The Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) has noted multiple
"longer-term downside risks" to the Australian economy, with
preparation measures needed to reduce the impact.
The recent escalation saw increased tariffs
imposed by both sides, with neither President Trump or Chairman Xi likely to
give in any time soon. New 15% tariffs on US$112 billion of Chinese goods have
been applied by the US, with China starting to impose 5% and 10% tariffs on
another US$75 billion worth of US goods. All Chinese goods will be subject to
tariffs by the end of 2019, and President Trump seems more keen than ever for
US firms to stop doing business with China altogether.
Even though Trump claims that China is
footing the bill for the tariffs, evidence suggests that most costs are carried
over to US importers and consumers. After the latest round of tariffs were
announced, hundreds of US companies and professional groups asked Trump to
postpone the moves, saying they would destroy jobs and increase prices.
According to a University of Michigan study, consumer confidence is at its
lowest level since 2012, with US investments also down on some figures.
The risk to Australia is relatively small
at the moment, but by no means insignificant. According to the RBAs latest
assessment, we can expect a 0.2% reduction in economic growth for 2019 and 2020
as a result of the trade war. There are lots of additional long-term risks, however,
especially if the negative trade environment leads to a global recession.
Despite the reduced nature of acute impacts to the Australian economy, RBA
governor Philip Lowe recently identified the trade war as the single biggest
risk to the global economy.
In fact, there may even be an upside to the
trade way, at least from Australia's perspective. If Chinese authorities resort
to stimulus measures to keep their economy ticking over, there is likely to be
increased demand for natural resources such as iron ore, coal and liquefied
natural gas. While these short-term gains would be intensified ad prolonged if
China reduces its business with competing US markets, we are at risk if China
is given incentives to work with the US.
According to the RBA, "There may be
some short-term upside, particularly if China stops buying agricultural goods
from the US and if more Chinese tourists choose Australia over the US."
However, "The issue is the distortions such purchase agreements will
impose on the global trading system as we and other countries seek markets
further afield for our goods... It could increase the cost of shipping, which
means consumers and producers will face higher costs."